Institutional role of the prosecutor's office in preventing and combating corruption in the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine: delimitation of powers and ways to improve the legal framework

The provisions of normative legal acts that determine the prosecutor's office scope competence, in particular their tasks and functions, have been studied. As a result, it has found current approach to determining competence is manifested primarily consolidation at legislative level main functions office; Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) are fixed departmental regulation without delimitation.
 In order differentiate powers prevent combat corruption, National Bureau Ukraine (NABU) clarified investigation criminal corruption corruption-related offenses committed by NABU employees. It established office, represented prosecutors, authorized participating proceedings on administrative related employees.
 result study, concluded depending content involved preventing combating different ways, such activities clearly dualistic, namely: one hand, SAP compliance with law during operational investigative pre-trial can or stop possible employees; other if offense official, must, particular, ensure inevitability liability for offense, within compensate damages caused offenses.
 grouped: representative, supervisory, security enforcement.
 effective functioning SAP, prevention NABU, author's version Section 3 Regulation Prosecutor General's proposed.